Generation Dumbed Down: Smart phones are destroying teenagers ability to read, write and study maths

Jonathan Haidt

Yesterday I attended an extraordinary lecture by Jonathan Haidt ( pronounced height) a US social psychologist revealing extremely worrying trends following the invention of smart phones on kids education’s prospects.

It showed both in the UK and the US that educational attainment – far from rising – is dropping and that issues like mental illness and self harm are rising.

His research can precisely connect the emergence of the ubiquitous smart phone and a dramatic change in attainment in schools, increased loneliness among teenagers, who then become vulnerable prey to malevolent influencers or in the most extreme cases tricked by criminals and paedophiles.

We are all aware of teenagers being glued to their phones – even when walking down the streets – and might have thought this is a passing phrase with nothing to worry about. This research suggests otherwise.

Situation in UK worse since Covid lockdown

Part of the increase in isolation comes from this present generation’s experience of the Covid pandemic and lockdown. One might then expect to see some bounce back when life returned to normal. But his research shows the opposite, the situation in the UK and US is worse post Covid.

The main players in this are undoubtedly short videos on Tik Tok, Snapchat and Instagram – which provide addictive instant distraction and gratification for teenagers, and make more detailed lessons studying books or complicated maths formula seem boring. Add this to the distractions of X Box computer games and kids can – and sometime do – have 24 hours glued to screens only to be tired and irritable the next day.

Jonathan Haidt pointed out in his lecture that puberty is also the time when the brain develops new connections allowing teenagers to understand more complex concepts and ideas as well as emotional development. But fed on a permanent diet of addictive videos and porn is not helping the brain to develop and probably damaging it.

Given the power of Big Tech to influence politicians – brilliantly illustrated recently when a victorious Donald Trump was surrounded by billionaire tech barons- can we do anything about it?

The answer according to him is yes. Schools can play a big role in curbing the rot by banning the use of phones while teenagers are learning. My daughter, who teaches at a private school in Luton dealing exclusively with kids who have been expelled from other mainstream schools, all phones have to be handed in at the beginning of the day and returned when they leave. Even the staff are restricted from using phones so as not to set a bad example to the kids there.

Schools – and there are by no means enough of them – that have done this according to his research have seen a dramatic increase in educational attainment in English, maths and science and a dramatic decrease in disrupted lessons making it easier for teachers to do their job.

Sir Keir Starmer should be concerned

The government ought to be concerned about this. Sir Keir Starmer, has set great store on increasing the skills of a new generation so he can get the growth needed to boost jobs and the economy. But it is being undermined by this trend where the latest generation are being continually distracted by what they see on their smart phone. Employers are not keen to take on people whose spend time exclusively on their phones and as a result have worse literacy and mathematical skills.

For those who want to follow this up you should go to Jonathan Haidt’s website https://www.anxiousgeneration.com/ where his research team has all the details you need to know about this trend and its implications seem to have passed us all by.

One-Time
Monthly
Yearly

Make a one-time donation

Make a monthly donation

Make a yearly donation

Choose an amount

£5.00
£10.00
£20.00
£5.00
£15.00
£100.00
£5.00
£15.00
£100.00

Or enter a custom amount

£

Your contribution is appreciated.

Your contribution is appreciated.

Your contribution is appreciated.

DonateDonate monthlyDonate yearly

Please donate to Westminster Confidential

£10.00

Mass use of phones

Teens in circle holding smart mobile phones – Multicultural young people using cellphones outside – Teenagers addicted to new technology concept

AI instantly speeded up my NHS medical treatment – but MPs say government has a long way to go to achieve universal provision

Scanner at the Paul Strickland Scanner Centre charity at Mount Vernon Hospital

I am currently being monitored by the NHS after having day surgery last year to remove a melanoma on my lower back. As part of the cancer recovery treatment I am being checked every three months at Mount Vernon hospital with both a CT and MRI scans to make sure there is no recurrence and having my skin checked by a dermatologist at Hemel Hempstead hospital.

Two weeks ago I had both scans at the Paul Strickland Scanner Centre, run by an independent charity, at the hospital. Imagine my surprise and nervousness when the CT scanner said to me as I was about to go home to stay behind because doctors were taking a look at my CT scan.

Then Luke, a junior doctor at Mount Vernon, turned up to tell me the scan had discovered blood clots in my lung. What was really amazing to me it had been discovered because the scanners at the charity use AI to check CT scanner. The AI showed up something was wrong which led the radiographer to examine the scan more closely to reveal multiple blood clots.

As a result I got instant medical treatment instead of waiting for the standard 14 days for the results of the scan to come back. The doctors and nurses gave me a through check on the spot – blood pressure, an ecg, a blood sample and checks on my breathing before prescribing blood thinners to start treatment that night.

Undetected blood clot produced no serious symptoms

If it was not for AI for the last two weeks I would have had a untreated blood clot on my lung without me knowing anything about it. It was virtually symptomless apart from a dull pain in my upper back when I was driving which I had put down to old age rather than anything else.

What I didn’t know is that Paul Strickland Scanner Centre, a charity which relies on donations, is at the cutting edge of linking AI with radiology. Its first introduction of new AI linked scanners was in 2022 -way ahead of other centres.

At the time Mr Will McGuire, the Deputy Superintendent for MRI at Paul Strickland Scanner Centre, said:“It’s the first time we have used deep learning, often referred to as artificial intelligence, as part of the image acquisition. The scanner software has been trained on thousands of scans. When the radiographer runs the scan, the scanner takes less data from the patient and the ‘Deep Resolve’ software then basically fills in the gaps based on its knowledge. The software packages we will get will both reduce ‘noise’ on scan images and provide radiologists with a better definition image.”

New uses for ” Deep Resolve ” software which could benefit kidney, prostate and breast cancer patients are also being pioneered this year. For the first time MRI scans could analyse bone structure as well as soft tissue speeding up treatment and reducing the need for both CT and MRI scans. The charity is planning to demonstrate this new technique at the European Congress of Radiology this year.

The initiatives by the charity show how dramatic the use of AI could transform services inside the NHS to benefit patients and provide services. I gather from Hillingdon NHS Trust where the hospital is based – though it is run by the East and North Hertfordshire NHS Trust – that there is also a trial using AI among hospitals in North West London to provide instant information after chest X rays which would speed up treatment.

The latest information on the state of public provision of AI came from a report by the Commons Public Accounts Committee after a National Audit Office report reveal very uneven provision.

The report concluded that the government is facing significant challenges to introduce AI across Whitehall and the NHS – with out of date computer systems and a big shortage of skilled staff.

It says :”For AI to be used well, it needs high quality data on which to learn …too often Government data are of poor quality, and often locked away in out-of-date, or ‘legacy’, IT systems, which are partially defined as “an end-of-life product, out of support from the supplier, [and] impossible to update…” An estimated 28% of central government systems met this definition in 2024. Approximately a third of Government’s 72 highest-risk legacy systems still lack remediation funding. The report warns that there are no quick fixes here, and calls for funding for the remediation of this kind of technology to be prioritised.”

“Another barrier to the safe and effective adoption of AI by Government are longstanding and persistent digital skills shortages. Around half of roles advertised in civil service digital and data campaigns went unfilled in 2024, and 70% of Government departments report difficulty recruiting and retaining staff with AI skills. The PAC has long raised concerns about digital skills gaps in Government, and is sceptical that the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology’s (DSIT) planned digital reforms will address the problem.”

Government’s ” sclerotic digital architecture”

Sir Geoffrey Clifton-Brown MP, Chair of the Committee, said:“The Government has said it wants to mainline AI into the veins of the nation, but our report raises questions over whether the public sector is ready for such a procedure. The ambition to harness the potential of one of the most significant technological developments of modern times is of course to be welcomed. Unfortunately, those familiar with our Committee’s past scrutiny of the Government’s frankly sclerotic digital architecture will know that any promises of sudden transformation are for the birds.

“A transformation of thinking in Government at senior levels is required, and the best way for this to happen is for digital professionals to be brought round the top table in management and governing boards of every Department and their agencies. I have serious concerns that DSIT does not have the authority over the rest of Government to bring about the scale and pace of change that’s needed. We hope the recommendations in our report aid the Government in succeeding in bringing public sector systems into the 21st century for their users, where other efforts have failed.”

Perhaps MPs on the committee and NHS government ministers should go and visit the Paul Strickland Scanner Centre at Mount Vernon Hospital in Northwood and see how they have pioneered linking AI to radiology. It is anything but sclerotic and ministers might learn how to avoid some of the pitfalls of the great transformation they are promising. Many patients, including me, would be very grateful if they did.

One-Time
Monthly
Yearly

Make a one-time donation

Make a monthly donation

Make a yearly donation

Choose an amount

£5.00
£10.00
£20.00
£5.00
£15.00
£100.00
£5.00
£15.00
£100.00

Or enter a custom amount

£

Your contribution is appreciated.

Your contribution is appreciated.

Your contribution is appreciated.

DonateDonate monthlyDonate yearly

Please donate to Westminster Confidential

£10.00