Too expensive to reveal: The 2000 Whitehall emails on Just Solutions International

The  secretive and expensive world of the miniistry of justice

The secretive and expensive world of the ministry of justice

Earlier this year this blog disclosed how the Ministry of Justice had  quietly set up a profit making subsidiary with the aim of marketing justice to obnoxious and corrupt regimes like Kazakhstan, Saudi Arabia and has now been revealed Macedonia.

This disclosure caused some embarrassment and a lot of anger that the United Kingdom government should be bidding to profit from advising countries like Saudi Arabia who lash bloggers and hold street beheadings which the UK forcibly condemn should the Islamic State do the same. The anger is most eloquently expressed on the blog of lawyer David Allen Green who runs a superb commentary on his Jack of Kent blog.

Naturally I thought it  would be in the public interest to find  out exactly how this rather shadowy body had been set up and what was the ministerial drive behind it.So what better device than the  current Freedom of Information Act to ask the ministry the questions. That was last January .

This was my request:” I would like to request details of all emails and communications between ministers and officials held by the Ministry of Justice and NOMS regarding the establishment of Just Solutions International  under the present coalition government.”

it took the ministry exactly 28 days( the maximum under the act)  to decide that such a request was so broad that they sent me a letter saying they would refuse to proceed with it at all unless I narrowed its scope. They could have told me the next day if it was the case.

So on February 25 I sent an amended request:

“What I would like to request  are documents and communications ( by email) between officials and ( if any) between officials and ministers which led to the creation of Just Solutions International. eg pertaining to  the reason why it was set up and. its role within noms and the ministry.”

It took until late April ( way beyond the 28 day period) to answer with a lovely letter dated xx April 2015 . And guess what evidently Whitehall has so much material debating the creation of Just Solutions International that it is too expensive to send it to me.

According to the letter it exceeds the £600 cost limit and would take civil servants more than three and a half days to find them all.

As their letter says; “In this instance to provide you with the information we would be required to locate emails, which we have estimated exceed 2000, since 2012 which detail the creation of Just Solutions international.”

They have suggested I could narrow down the request a again either to a short time period or by named official ( I don’t have the names of all the officials anyway). However in the spirit of kindly co-operation I have narrowed down the time limit to one year and see if this yields any results. I await the reply  with interest though they have not given me the courtesy of saying they received the request yet.

I suspect that the officials don’t really want to release anything – because the whole volume of correspondence – seems to suggest to me that they had a lot to discuss about why and how this  private profit making company was set up. But there is no reason yet to give up and all the more reason to probe exactly what is behind an initiative that believes making money from dodgy regimes is an ethical revenue earner for the taxpayer.

7 thoughts on “Too expensive to reveal: The 2000 Whitehall emails on Just Solutions International

  1. David the FOI system is a veneer of truth when in fact it’s fudge avoid deflect confuse and put off anyone asking qusetions about anything
    Maybe it’s because its you they do this
    Perhaps they look up who the requester is and if they think you might cause trouble with the info then they mess you about

    FOI to home office since I made a few requests so far I’ve had one rejected marked hidden and removed

    Then they responded to a different request with reply that didn’t fit
    Then I am referred to another dept
    Then as yourself you get the standard

    ” it is not clear what it is you are requesting ”
    Yes that’s right that’s a standard response

    Perhaps you should ask them an easy question about FOI team and service and ask whe is it so bloody useless,

    Like

  2. What if the dark secret at the heart of it is that senior civil servant – and advisers on secondment from reputable consultancy firms – did their best to shield their minister from it.

    Not so much ‘keeping him in the dark’ as much as a sensible recognition that Grayling might’ve been too stupid and inept – or unpalatable to potential clients – and a sound commercial policy would be to keep him at arm’s length.

    The legitimate reason to keep other ministers at arms length (although surely not Grayling himself) would be commercial sensitivity and a potential conflict of interests: try finding any prominent back-bencher who has no business interests with a competing consultancy.

    So: good luck finding any correspondence, this time ’round.

    Like

  3. Pingback: The Bristol Cable | Bristol lawyers challenge UK’s flogging of justice to Saudi Arabia

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s