With growing interest on the abuse of people on the internet, some amazing figures have emerged from the Ministry of Justice showing the huge rise in the number of prosecutions in the last decade.
I am indebted to the pay wall site of Media Lawyer for permission to reproduce much of their findings and to Inforrm blog who have also published the report.
Ten years ago just 143 people were convicted of the crime to send “by means of a public electronic communications network” a message or other material that is “grossly offensive or of an indecent, obscene or menacing character”.
Last year – the latest figure for convictions had soared to 1209 – an extraordinary eight fold increase.
As Media Lawyer reports:
“The previously little-used section [ Section 127 of the malicious communications act 2003] has come to prominence in recent years following a string of high-profile cases of so-called trolling on social media sites.
It can also cover phone calls and e-mails, and cases of “persistent misuse” which cause the victim annoyance, inconvenience or needless anxiety.
Ministry of Justice statistics show that 1,501 defendants – including 70 juveniles – were prosecuted under the Act last year, while another 685 were cautioned.
Of those convicted, 155 were jailed – compared with just seven a decade before. The average custodial sentence was 2.2 months.
Compared with the previous year there was an 18% increase in convictions under Section 127 but the number has dipped since a peak in 2012 when there were 1,423.”
The article adds:
” The issue of online abuse came under scrutiny after cases such as the targeting of Labour MP Stella Creasy, who spoke of the “misery” she suffered caused after a Twitter troll re-tweeted menacing posts threatening to rape her and branding her a “witch”.
Other victims of trolling have included campaigner Caroline Criado-Perez and Chloe Madeley, daughter of Richard Madeley and Judy Finnigan.
The MoJ figures also revealed a similar rise in the number of convictions under the Malicious Communications Act, which makes it an offence to send a threatening, offensive or indecent letter, electronic communication or article with the intent to cause distress or anxiety.
Last year, 694 people were convicted of offences under this Act – the highest number for at least a decade and more than 10 times more than the 64 convictions recorded in 2004.”
I have noticed an increase – since this blog has highlighted child sexual abuse – in the number of survivors who speak out and then find themselves the target of trolls – sometimes saying they don’t believe their story.
The government will increase penalties. Media lawyer reports it will increase: “the maximum sentence for trolls convicted under the Malicious Communications Act from six months to two years and extend the time limit for prosecutions under Section 127 of the Communications Act 2003 to three years from the commission of offence.”
Obviously there has to be a balance between pursuing people and free speech – with the previous head of the Crown Prosecution Service now a Labour MP, Keith Starmer, saying there must be a ” high threshold” and people practising internet jokes should not be prosecuted. But what is disturbing -and I intend to return to this is that the abuse and misuse of the internet is growing and there may be a case for even harsher penalties for the most persistent offenders.
I’ve had this a few times david even with threats to hunt me down find me and cause me harm. I had police at my premises about it and was told ” there’s nothing we can do ”
Pingback: INTERNET TROLLS - BEWARE !! | The Truth Behind The Hoax
It’s really important not to conflate trolling with abuse. Calling behaviour which causes harm, threats, gross offensiveness and so on, ‘trolling’, is wrong for a number of reasons. Winding people up and being provocative is also known as ‘trolling’, and it is fundamentally different from abusive behaviour. Abuse is abuse. It should not be put under the euphemism of trolling. Doing so enables people being abusive to say “It was only trolling”, and minimise the intent and effects of their abuse. But it also means that non-abusive humour and ridicule, particularly of politicians and public figures, can be suppressed by associating it with abuse.
How refreshing to find someone who knows the true meaning of trolling! Maybe the author of the article and other journalists will learn from this and do better next time.
In my case the online offender even changed their name and made mote threats. Later on I had another threat of being hunted down and harmed by someone else.
Again I had the ” nothing we can do ”
Response from police
Reblogged this on Nathaliehickson's Blog and commented:
Malicious communications act. Not heard of before but something am used to getting when worked with homeless people & personally in letters & emails. Harassment act & hate crimes another area of interest.
Reblogged this on Britain Isn't Eating.
The SuperTrolls that David knows of on Twitter caused the death of my partner of 37 years on 24th November 2017. We were both trolled, stalked and abused 24/7 for two years by a gang ran by a woman in holland connected to a minor ex police tv celebrity attached to a super troll black labrador who was a senior adviser with the citizens advice bureau and his accessory to the crimes a creepy individual in Cumbria, also there is a connection to another former cop who became a PCC. There are currently two police investigations underway and I shall not rest until all of them are brought to justice for their course of conduct that resulted in the sudden unexpected death which is technically manslaughter by cyberstalking of my innocent partner. We did nothing to these atrocious examples of humanity, their abuse was unsolicited and they had no reason except to follow the orders of a disgruntled gang leader in Holland who was upset we saw through her in 2013 and dropped our help for her. The other victims of this unsavoury monstrous gang are Graham Wilmer and Esther Baker who implicated us as supplying Esther with information for one of her blogs which the Cumbrian monster has a blog about full of lies and false allegations about myself and my partner. A blog is underway here https://lahazablogblog.wordpress.com/2017/08/29/why-is-editor-of-bournemouth-echo-persecuting-a-homosexual/
I have put this up as an example of the angst caused by trolls. As to the story itself on their blog I have not investigated it myself but it sounds alarming
Reblogged this on Site Title.