
If ever there was a case of one rule for the well connected and another for ordinary plebs, the exposure of this ruling out today by the House of Commons Standards Committee is a great example.
It centres round the conviction of Charles Elphicke, the former Tory MP for Dover, of three counts of sexual assault on two women in July last year and sentenced in last September to two years in prison. He is currently appealing the case.
The MPs had given glowing character references for Mr Elphicke in the hope of mitigating his sentence and became alarmed when newspapers wanted the judge involved in the case to release the names of everybody who had given character references for him.
So instead of publicly objecting the MPs decided to write on Commons notepaper to Dame Kathryn Thirwall, Senior Presiding Judge for England and Wales, and Dame Victoria Sharp, President of the Queen’s Bench Division, copied to Mrs Justice Whipple. Mrs Justice Whipple had heard the trial of a former Member, Charlie Elphicke, and was to hear and decide on an application to release the pre-sentencing character references.

The five Tory MPs were Mrs Natalie Elphicke, the former MP’s wife; Sir Roger Gale, former Cabinet minister, Theresa Villiers, Adam Holloway and Colonel Bob Stewart. Natalie Elphicke organised the letter.
The MPs said to disclose the references would be a “radical change to judicial practice” which “could have the [sic] chilling effect and harm the criminal justice system”.
They got a stiff reply from the Private Secretary to the Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales November to the letter stating that “It is improper to seek to influence the decision of a judge in a matter of which he or she is seized in this way. [ … ] It is all the more regrettable when representatives of the legislature, writing as such on House of Commons notepaper, seek to influence a judge in a private letter and do so without regard for the separation of powers or the independence of the judiciary”.
Their names- along with life peer Lord Freud- became public when Mrs Justice Whipple released them in a court ruling.

The Standards Committee ruled today that what the MPs” by acting as they did risked giving the impression that elected politicians can bring influence to bear on the judiciary, out of public view and in a way not open to others. Such egregious behaviour is corrosive to the rule of law and, if allowed to continue unchecked, could undermine public trust in the independence of judges.”
The committee recommends that three of the MPs Mrs Natalie Elphicke, Sir Roger Gale, and Theresa Villiers be suspended from the House for one sitting day, and should apologise to the House by means of a letter to the Committee.

The other two MPs, Bob Stewart and Adam Holloway – who decided to sign the letter after glancing at it for 20 seconds- should apologise to the House of Commons in a personal statement.
The committee recommends all five Members should also apologise to the Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales by letter copied to the Committee. The terms of all the apologies (both by letter and by personal statement) should be agreed in advance by Mr Speaker and the Chair of the Committee.
Four of the five MPs have been contrite about bringing Parliament into disrepute after being summoned by the committee – but Sir Roger Gale has refused to apologise and said he would do it again. He told the committee: “I would find a different way of doing it, but would I do it again—would I seek to achieve the same effect? Yes, I would”.
The report points out that Theresa Villiers is an experienced Member of the House, a trained barrister, and a former Secretary of State for Northern Ireland. “We would have expected a Member of her seniority and experience, with legal expertise, to have been particularly aware that her actions in this case were an attempt improperly to interfere in judicial proceedings.”
Earlier this year Lord Freud was ordered by the Lords Commissioner for Standards to apologise and make a statement. A report was published on my blog here.
An utter disgrace, also a wife who would go to such lengths to help her husband after he had been found guilty of sexually abusing two women. That said why should we be surprised, this is the person who made such crass remarks about Marcus Rashford in his efforts to feed the starving children in this country, so glad they were given short change they should be ashamed of themselves.
LikeLike
No surprise there as they covered for Saville, Smith etc etc for years ??
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hi Marlene
Just read this. Crikey
P
LikeLike
Is this not classed as perjury?
LikeLiked by 1 person
The five people named should all have lost their positions. The big question is, how many times have MPs and the like done this and it hasn’t come to light? When such behaviour is revealed I absolutely do not believe this is the first time it’s ever happened.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Expect nothing less from this corrupt government. I hope to see them removed and soon.
Get Outlook for iOS ________________________________
LikeLiked by 1 person
Perhaps you should invite comment from the Chairs of their Constituency party as to whether this kind of behaviour is condoned or whether the local party will be considering de-selection
LikeLiked by 1 person
Whatever next…setting Charlie boy up in a business? Aside from the friends names, things never change.
LikeLike
This pp art’s MPs are just getting more and more open about their right to do whatever they like, irrespective of their position. They’re blade and opportunistic about their behaviour and absolutely unapologetic. They stick together like the preverbial popp to a wool blanket….
LikeLike
Disgusting 🥵🥵 should be a petition to stop this.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on Tory Britain! .
LikeLike