Love’s Labour’s Lost: The party conference that now puts realism before socialism

This week I paid a lightening visit to the Labour Party Conference in Liverpool and found a remarkably changed and brutally focused party.

Out had gone any commitment to state ownership, hugely expensive pledges to spend, spend, spend and in had come a sharp focus on bread and butter issues like cutting hospital waiting lists and building lots of homes for generation homeless..

There was also a brutal message from Sir Keir Starmer that the party would be raising very little on new taxes- beyond taxing non doms and VAT on private school fees. Everything was going to depend on growing the economy from its present feeble state to pay for new public spending. If that fails the whole Labour project will collapse once they are in government – a big hostage to fortune.

What was also noticeable was the huge presence of corporate firms and large charities and ngos – never have I seen such numbers in the exhibition hall and its overflow corridor.

The main reason why Labour is being cautious is the state of the British economy post Brexit. Although Brexit was never mentioned by the Labour leadership, the chaos and incompetence of the present Tory government ( now also emerging in the Covid inquiry) has virtually torched the British economy, now bedevilled with a cost of living crisis and high inflation. And they can’t blame the EU. But it is worse than that – the chopping and changing in government policy -illustrated by scrapping HS2 at Manchester during their conference last week and delays in the net zero programme – has even bewildered their business allies who don’t know where they are and how they should plan.

That is why they see a Labour government as a better bet than the Tories. It is ironic that after all the attacks on Jeremy Corbyn turning Labour into a cult – it is now the Tories that are turning into one – with their obsession with opposing trans rights, boat people, cancel culture and recreating the UK in the image of the 1950s. No wonder much of business ran off to Liverpool.

David Blunkett; Official House of Lords portrait

I did attend two very interesting fringe meetings during my short stay. Both illustrated the new order at Labour. One organised by the TUC was on the subject of tackling Britain’s skill shortages among the workforce. It was addressed by Steve Rotherham, the Labour Metro Mayor of Liverpool; Bridget Phillipson, Labour’s shadow education secretary; Labour peer David Blunkett; and chaired by Kevin Rowan from the TUC. What was impressive was that the TUC and David Blunkett had drawn up a very detailed plan to tackle the crippling skills shortage – often overlooked by politicians – and Bridget Phillipson, was keen to implement it. It included scrapping the very low wage of £5.28 a n hour for apprentices and replacing it with the minimum wage and radically changing the funding programme to tackle skills shortages and prevent employers exploiting it for cheap labour. If Labour are serious in doing this, it will be fundamental to economic recovery.

An even bigger eyeopener was a fringe meeting organised by Labour’s environment campaign, Chaired by a Westminster Labour councillor , the campaign had both the head of forests, from Global Witness and a Aviva, the private insurance company on the panel. It turned out that both Global Witness and Aviva had been working together to ensure UK legislation that would stop British firms contributing to global deforestation by de investing in companies that did this. Even this it appeared had been opposed by the Tories.

One extraordinary meeting I did not get into was on the controversial future of rail to be addressed by Labour’s shadow transport secretary, Louise Haigh. Organised by Lodestone Communications, whose clients include US whiskies, the Countess of Chester Hospital ( not best to advertise this at the moment) and IT firms, it was private but important enough for the general secretaries of ASLEF and the RMT to attend. I was told it shouldn’t have been advertised in Labour’s conference programme and been placed there by mistake. Very intriguing.

Women born in the 1950s who have faced a six year delay in their pension would have been pleased by a motion which was passed by Labour’s women’s conference. It commits the next Labour government to fully implement in law the UN Convention on the Elimination of All Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) and ensure equal pay for women is fully implemented. We shall see if Sir Keir Starmer makes this a manifesto commitment.

Please donate to Westminster Confidential.

One-Time
Monthly
Yearly

Make a one-time donation

Make a monthly donation

Make a yearly donation

Choose an amount

£5.00
£10.00
£20.00
£5.00
£15.00
£100.00
£5.00
£15.00
£100.00

Or enter a custom amount

£

Your contribution is appreciated.

Your contribution is appreciated.

Your contribution is appreciated.

DonateDonate monthlyDonate yearly

Please donate to Westminster Confidential

£10.00

6 thoughts on “Love’s Labour’s Lost: The party conference that now puts realism before socialism

  1. the whole country will never ever be better off with whoever is in 10 downing st. And never has been…. or ever will be. apart from the filthy rich that is.. enough said. A vote cast is a vote wasted these days… oh well how sad never mind. Carry on as always then…….

    Like

    • Sorry Janet that’s entirely the attitude which angers me. If you can’t be bothered to vote then you shouldn’t be commenting on political matters.

      Like

    • The great socialist experiment is finally dead and buried. It worked in 1945 but if instituted now it would be doomed to failure. Why? The electorate of both eras are completely different. The pre-1945 generations saw real poverty and hunger. Granted there are deprevations today but not on the same level. You cannot compare the two. Whether we can admit it we a.l know deep down we now live in a country that is fundamentally all about ME. Even the poor will grab the opportunity of wealth irrespective and aware of what others on their block are suffering. What can we do to ensure children and the elderly do not go hungry and cold without reverting to the giro culture. I do not know but ones thing for sure opening the cheque book at a local level will not work. Rent caps, Nationalise Energy Utility companies and limit the food companies extreme profits would be a better use of a future goverments time post 2024.

      Like

  2. As an american outsider I have questions…
    Is the PLP still majority neoliberal (or Blarite if you prefer)?
    Now that leadership are mostly corporate tools as well, why isn’t there a mass exodus to the Greens by say, Momentum and socialists in the membership (if membership is the correct word for Labour voters)?
    I say the Greens because it would avoid having to start another party.
    If not, what mechanisms could insurgents on the left use to retake the party?
    The Tories and Labour seem to be following the Dems and Repubs in the u.s. to a large degree. If you are essentially like us now, electoral politics is a lost cause. Many of our so-called leaders around the world are making radical collective action the only logical course, but we’re very far from that – as long as people can still ignore the damage done by corporations and the politicians they buy…

    Like

  3. Elizabeth. I am entitled to have an opinion. Just like you are. and just for the record. I always go out and VOTE on election days. and your attitude against someone you don’t even know. Is
    Atrocious…

    Like

Leave a reply to Janet Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.