CROSS POSTED ON BYLINE.COM
The Janner family and their accusers have all been denied ” core participant ” status in Westminster child sexual abuse strand of the independent child sexual abuse inquiry.
Instead they will keep ” core participant” status in a separate strand of the inquiry which examine the allegations against his father in an inquiry into child sexual abuse in institutions in Leicestershire where he was an MP.
Core participants have special rights in the Inquiry process. These include receiving disclosure of documentation, being represented and making legal submissions, suggesting questions and receiving advance notice of the Inquiry’s report.
Alexis Jay, chair of the inquiry, announced the decision, following an appeal by his son, Daniel Janner and his two daughters, Marion and Rabbi Laura Janner-Klausner.
Daniel Janner told the preliminary hearing in January :”The strand does risk turning into a witch-hunt of dead politicians,a circus, where fantasists will have free rein to live out their fantasies in evidence. There were no paedophile rings in Westminster, save in warped imaginations. But the evidence and findings of the Westminster strand will have an influence and bearing on the strand which follows in my late father’s name, because, madam chairman, the two strands — again, as we have witnessed today — are inevitably and inexorably intertwined.”
Alexis Jay said yesterday: ” The extent that Mr Janner’s application is based on concerns about his father’s reputation, and his ability to respond to allegations made about his father, these are matters for the Investigation involving the late Lord Janner of Braunstone QC, in which the children of the late Lord Janner have already been granted core participant status.”
The inquiry also refused an appeal by a survivor who was sexually abused under the care of Hackney social services. but he may be able to appear as a witness.
” I acknowledge that WM-A4 may be able to provide the investigation with a first-hand account of what his lawyer described as “a system” of practices involving child sexual abuse operating at Westminster. This may well make him a useful witness to this investigation and the Inquiry will consider whether to ask him to provide a witness statement.”
Other decisions made earlier include granting core participant status to Esther Baker,
Alexis Jay said of her :
“Ms Baker alleges that she was sexually assaulted by persons of public prominence associated with Westminster and that there were institutional failings in
connection with that alleged abuse by police and law enforcement services.
“Ms Baker was under 18 years of age at the time of the sexual abuse described and therefore within the Inquiry’s terms of reference. Ms Baker also alleges related failings by public officers and bodies. I am also aware that Ms Baker has spoken publicly and in her own name about these matters, and I regard that as an important factor in considering the nature of her interest in this investigation.”
The Westminster strand also accepted as core participants survivors who say they were sexually abused by Sir Cyril Smith- the former Rochdale MP – in the context of Westminster. And Mike Veale, chief constable of Wiltshire Police, who ran Operation Conifer, into allegations of sexual abuse by Edward Heath, will also be a core participant.
Among others turned down for this strand include Jonathon Brackenbury who alleged sexual abuse in the military, one from Sarah McDonagh alleging sexual abuse involving a magistrates bench and one from Sabine McNeill on a cult in Hampstead, London. Jonathan Brackenbury decided on his own volition to withdraw his application but is willing to be called as a witness giving details he gave to the now closed Met police Operation Midland while he was working as a Homeless Housing Worker in the West End / Earls Court area of London in the 1980s. He is also proposing to submit a case to the inquiry for an investigation into sexual abuse in the military.
Pingback: Janner’s family – and his accusers – denied core participation status in Westminster child sexual abuse inquiry | David Hencke – leftwingnobody
Reblogged this on HOLLIE GREIG JUSTICE : SUPPORTING FRESH START @FSFtruthjustice and commented:
Pingback: DAVID ON jANNER | HOLLIE GREIG JUSTICE : SUPPORTING FRESH START @FSFtruthjustice
Pingback: JANNER | HOLLIE GREIG JUSTICE : SUPPORTING FRESH START @FSFtruthjustice
Many thanks for your steady stream of excellent pieces.
I trust this finds Margaret and yourself well. Please give her my best wishes.
I’m back on my feet again after a foot op last year and would be happy to meet as and when suits your diary.
Here’s something you may find of interest away from the Brexit furore — http://www.jewishvoiceforlabour.org.uk/antisemitism/searching-truth-line-abuse-allegations/
I’m an associate (non-Jewish) member of Jewish Voice for Labour (JVL) as a small act of solidarity with a number of Jewish Labour Party friends who encouraged me to write about “Labour’s antisemitism problem” last year.
It’s here — https://www.lobster-magazine.co.uk/issue74.php — along with an interesting follow-up piece by ex-MP Colin Challen.
I tread in this delicate area with considerable care for all the obvious reasons. But I’ve been so appalled at the cavalier way A/S allegations have been thrown around I thought I ought to do what I could to set the issue in some context.
The Jewish Chronicle has been excellent in recent weeks on the Jeremy Newmark/Jewish Labour Movement/Jewish Leadership Council business — https://www.thejc.com/news/uk-news/jeremy-newmark-urged-to-step-down-as-hertsmere-borough-councillor-1.459799 — with only The Times of the MSM following it up to my knowledge.
In haste but with best regards as ever,
The Janner family’s manipulative behaviour makes you wonder how deeply convinced they are of their father’s innocence.