MPs slam complacent equality watchdog and the government over “rife ” ageist discrimination


The Equality Act: Government complacency is allowing rife discrimination in the workplace against the over 50s Pic credit: Parliament UK


A damning report from the  Commons women and equalities committee has attacked the country’s equality watchdog and ministers for their complacent attitude in tackling age discrimination in the workplace and elsewhere.

The report released by the all party committee of MPs warns that the talents of up to one million women over the age of 50 are being wasted by outdated employment policies. Its strongly worded condemnation of the Equality and Human Rights Commission and ministers responsible for equality follows what can only be described as a pretty lack lustre response from both.

Chair of the Women and Equalities Committee, Maria Miller MP, said:

“Without effective intervention from the Government and EHRC, we cannot see how discriminatory practices against older people in employment, that we know are rife, will be tackled. That’s why I find the responses we have received today disappointing as we had hoped they would have worked together to agree specific enforcement actions across both the public and private sectors.

Our Committee will be taking follow up action to make sure we get the change that is desperately needed.”

The response from MPs highlights what they see as a failure to implement the  2010 Equality Act. They are particularly scathing of the failure by the EHRC which has powers – which appear to be rarely used – to use enforcement procedures  against employers who have ageist recruitment policies.

The lack of the use of its powers is worrying given that campaigners for 50s women who are waiting up to six years to get a pension also want the EHRC to use its powers to remedy what they see as discrimination against this group. This group who are being forced to look for work until they are 65 – are facing a double bind of  finding employers don’t want them while the state won’t give them a pension.

They have even had the facetious suggestion from Guy Opperman, the pensions minister, that they take jobs as apprenticeships at £3.60 an hour while they wait until they get a  pension.

The EHRC today said it would take action – even though this seems to be confined to fine words rather than deeds.

A spokeswoman  said: ““Everyone has the right to work and the right to a working environment that allows them to achieve their full potential. We have taken and will continue to take robust enforcement action, using all of our statutory powers, to tackle unlawful discrimination and ensure that no one is excluded from the workplace. This includes enabling Britain’s employers to benefit from the talent and contributions of workers of all ages.

“The right to request flexible working should apply from day one in all jobs and we have stressed the need for employers to make their workplaces accessible for everyone, including older people, parents and carers. We have also sought to tackle bias in recruitment by taking action against discriminatory adverts that request characteristics or terms that are associated with a particular age group.”
MPs are particularly angry that the government will not enact section 14 of the Equality Act – which would allow people to bring multiple ground cases against employers who discriminate against them. Thus an older woman could not bring a case on both age and sex – she has to choose one or the other.

Both former women’s minister Harriet Harman and the Fawcett Society have condemned ministers for not doing this. The government says it won’t do it because it increases burdens on business and promises more research in its response. One has to ask as this legislation was passed by Parliament – there must have been some research already behind it – so this is a pretty lame excuse.

The government uses the same excuse of putting too much a burden on employers to make it mandatory for firms employing over 250 people to publish an age breakdown of staff. Yet Whitehall already does it.

Altogether this is a pretty pathetic response from both the government and the watchdog to a serious issue. But I am very glad that the committee is also very dissatisfied and intends to pursue both organisations to come up with something better. You can get the full report here.

13 thoughts on “MPs slam complacent equality watchdog and the government over “rife ” ageist discrimination

  1. Thank you David, you are a real champion for women and we appreciate that so very much. I hope one day someone in this government grows a heart.


  2. The Government are paid mouthpieces for employers; when you swallow a king’s shilling, it’s difficult to be impartial & fair. Interesting report, thank you David.


  3. Thank you for the article David . In reality it is pointing out the obvious though as it is very hard to get a job after 50 let alone 60 and I am expected to work until 67 as a woman born in 1961. That equals 51 years of work. Too much for anyone in many cases and a breach of contract as I was told I could retire at 60 like all women since the Second World War.


  4. Deeds not words this is all very well but action is needed NOW so many women in dire need and dying before they can access their state pensions


  5. Pingback: So much for the Equality Act: Tory government and watchdog let ageist discrimination run ‘rife’ | Vox Political

  6. I agree with all the above comments but remember the government & 90% of MPs are only interested in themselves & filling their own pockets with gold. They care not one jot for us voters & taxpayers.


  7. Reblogged this on | truthaholics and commented:
    “Altogether this is a pretty pathetic response from both the government and the watchdog to a serious issue. But I am very glad that the committee is also very dissatisfied and intends to pursue both organisations to come up with something better. You can get the full report here.”


  8. I do not deny the right of any person, male or female to work at any age. A retirement age shouldn’t mean that a person of the age and older should be excluded from work but what raising the retirement age to 66 has meant is women who cannot get jobs or who are not well enough to work or can claim benefits, are destitute. At least before we had a choice. Needs to go back.


  9. I feel aggrieved that i have worked to pay into my state pension all my adult life, ti be told at 58 that i would have to work till 66. Th3 bill should have been implemented gradually.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.