I am rather surprised in the wake of Coulson’ s conviction for conspiracy over phone hacking none of the commentators have picked up the extraordinary passages about his appointment to the Tory Party in Matthew D’Ancona’s revealing book In It Together, The Inside Story of the Coalition Government.
In a series of purple passages he describes the determination of both George Osborne and David Cameron to woo him to become the £275k Conservative Party’s director of communications on 9 July 2007 – so soon after he resigned from the News of the World as editor over the conviction of Clive Goodman for phone hacking.
It is quite clear from Matthew’s account that Coulson himself had reservations about taking the job – which led him to become the Downing Street press secretary by 2010 at a salary of £140,000 a year – and in hindsight might suggest he was worried about further fall out over the phone hacking scandal.
But what is more extraordinary are the purple passages about Cameron’s passion for his professional abilities.. George Osborne is portrayed as a hard-headed strategist – Matthew describes his view of Coulson as ” a street fighter who could take the battle to Labour and win in a media knife-fight.”
But Cameron comes over as besotted with Coulson. According to Matthew ” Cameron..was awestruck by his communications director, whom he privately described in lyrical language.”
” He treated Coulson as a red top shaman, a source of secret knowledge about the world of tabloids, Essex and kitchen- table politics. The phone hacking story refused to go away but Cameron was determined not to yield to those who urged him to ditch Coulson.”
Matthew later adds – and remember that this written before the trial verdict – that Cameron was determined he must follow him into Downing Street and as a result didn’t want ” to ask too many questions.”
He writes:” Coulson had the talent of the outsider, and exercised a quietly magnetic influence upon his privileged bosses, bringing Billericay to Bullingdon.”
All this makes Cameron’s badly timed apology for appointing him show Cameron up as shallow turncoat. While it may not quite rank as an equivalent of Peter thrice denying Jesus, it says something about how a man who treats Coulson as a Messiah figure to connect with the working class and then distances himself as fast as he can when he is down and out. Particularly when it is clear from Matthew’s account that Coulson more than once offered to resign because of his Murdoch past.
Coulson has had a bad time – his trial and subsequent conviction – has led to a jury hearing about his ” love cheat “affair with Rebekah Brooks , his bullying manner from co accused Royal reporter Clive Goodman, and how he listened to the David Blunkett love tapes before publishing the story.
Don’t get me wrong, I am not sorry for Coulson or his fate but I do think the Prime Minister is being let off far too lightly. Peter Oborne has already exposed flaws in his apology statement, Matthew D’Ancona,a Tory insider himself, to my mind, exposes flaws in Cameron’s own character.
JUDAS denying Jesus three times?! Cock a doodle do!
Reblogged this on Vox Political and commented:
Agreed; David Cameron has far more questions to answer. The only way to even start getting those answers is to keep asking the questions.
The whole sorry story is down, ultimately, to politicians’ obsession with the low end media and the sound-bite/focus group political debate.
It has also produced shallower, superficial, contradictory government from both parties.
I realise the media has always been important to politicians but since Kinnock unexpectedly lost (for his supporters anyway) the election and “It Was The Sun Wot Won It”, Blair and Mandelson brought in this media obsessed style of government.
We are all the worse for it.
Don’t be silly. Cameron’s apology was not badly timed, it was timed exactly right. Any delay – on-going court case notwithstanding – would have resulted in big hullabaloo at PMQs with Labour demanding an apology. By getting in first, Cameron significantly reduced the impact of Miliband’s attack.
Although the judge did criticise Cameron, he also criticised other politicians, from all parties, for their comments. Indeed Justice Saunders said “I do not seek, nor intend, to single out the Prime Minister [for criticism]” but, of course, the media, led by the BBC, did exactly that.
Dougie, you might want to read this: http://www.parliament.uk/site-information/glossary/sub-judice/
Er, no: Peter, not Judas, David – clearly you didn’t pay enough attention in Sunday school –
“Jesus said unto him, Verily I say unto you, That this night, before the cock crows, you shall deny me three times”.
Judas betrayed Jesus with a kiss: the definitive ‘love cheat’.
I stand rebuked -never had a proper Catholic education! I have now changed the blog, once again you have caught me out, Mrs A!
Well, as you know, I was trained in theology, sophistry, and unarmed combat by the Sisters of the Poor Child Jesus. Not the worst of educations, I suppose.
crooks nothing but all in together its all about the lies they tell each other the sorryest thing is they are in charge when honesty isn’t part of their mantra jeff3. dh As long has one does some good you will be alright it doesn’t matter what god you didn’t prayed to.
But isn’t it a denial of democracy when a hired assistant can influence the press in favour of his employer in the manner intended by recruiting Coulson. Politics should not be ablout branding and clever headlines but about values and judgement and a policy programme.
That Cameron and Osborne were doing badly was a reflection on them and their lack of connection with the voters. To falsify their image by using a former red top editor shows just how distorted our political institutions have become.
Perhaps we need a full statement before each Generl Election of all the back room staff and the salaries paid so we can see who might be real and who is a pastiche.
Reblogged this on Britain Isn't Eating.
Pingback: Tories and thugs (#Savile warning) | The Yorkshire Ranter